Software Selection

Assess Risk More Accurately

    Accurate software selection requires much more than simplistic Yes/No comparisons, or high-level (summary) third-party opinions as to the suitability of a given software application. These do nothing to assess the RISK associated with each proposal (RFP response) because no attempt is made to analyze the FINANCIAL impact of each, or analyze the amount of custom programming required to implement the software features needed by a specific client. APES' standard, proven procedures enables you to:

• Evaluate RFP response using a full "Supported - Partially Supported - Not Supported - Free Enhancement - Paid Enhancement" software feature support matrix (FSP).
• Accurately assess the RISK of each RFP response (proposal), since the actual dollar amount associated with each feature's implementation and failure is known.
• Quickly determine the RISK and IMPACT of specific implementation plans via a High - Medium High - Medium - Medium Low - Low priority filter.
• Analyze the financial impact of all RFP responses. Calculate and compare the IRR, PV, NPV, and Payback of all vendor proposals.
• Quickly calculate and illustrate Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) based on "What-If" future requirements projections.