![]() |
Retail Point of Sale SystemRFP - Example Questions |
This Ready-to-Use RFP Master is focused on selecting retail point of sale system software solutions, and provides capabilities that go far beyond those of a traditional RFP limited to asking vendors simple Yes/No questions about software features. Specialized for use in complex information system environments, this RFP Master collects information from vendors about all aspects of the retail point of sale software implementation project they are proposing.
To view a list of the business functions Click Here!
Actual screens and questions from this RFP are shown below to illustrate how it enables you to easily collect the unique metrics needed to successfully identify, acquire, and implement the retail point of sale software solution best suited to your company's needs. This RFP contains questions that query vendors about SaaS, Cloud Computing, Voice Technology, and other emerging capabilities to ensure the optimum fit to your current and future requirements.
Click to Enlarge

SAVE WEEKS, even MONTHS OF TIME by using thousands of professionally written POS software RFP statements & questions to communicate your POS software system requirements quickly and accurately. No need to re-invent the wheel. View typical RFP Table of Contents.
Click to Enlarge

"APPLES-to-APPLES" COMPARISON of vendor RFP responses (proposals) is assured by extensive use of quantitative RFP questions and full vendor response validation. Compare proposed POS system software features side-by-side faster and more accurately with the fully automated Color Comparison Chart matrix included with this RFP at no extra charge. View a typical comparison here.
Click to Enlarge

IDENTIFY Feature AVAILABILITY & DELIVERABILITY. Unlike other RFPs, Infotivity RFP Masters automatically collect the information needed to identify BOTH the AVAILABILITY of software features, and their DELIVERABILITY, i.e., HOW those features will be delivered. Each RFP Master includes a Feature Support Matrix (FSM) to automatically capture this information, which can be used to create very accurate and reliable retail point of sale software system implementation schedules. View samples here.
Click to Enlarge

Determine RISK and SUPPORTABILITY. RFP Masters automatically evaluate vendor response data collected to quantitatively determine the SUPPORTABILITY INDEX of each proposed software system. This index ranks the potential support problems inherent in each proposal. Accurately compare the amount of ongoing support needed to keep each proposed POS software system up and running. Measure the true impact of each system on your business over the long term. View sample here.
Click to Enlarge

AUTOMATED WEIGHTED GRADE POINT SCORING is a quantitative measure of how well a proposed POS software system matches up to your business priorities. This graph compares the overall total scores for each proposed system. This Score is based on all vendor responses except Pricing and Vendor Background. View sample 3-D Bar Chart comparison here.
Click to Enlarge

VENDOR RESPONSE VALIDATION saves time and effort, and reduces errors, when evaluating vendor POS software proposals. View example here.

EASILY CUSTOMIZED to meet your unique retail point of sale system needs, using basic Excel techniques.

PROVEN MS EXCEL TECHNOLOGY. Everybody already knows Excel. Save time & effort across the board!
No installation, no learning curve.
(See bottom of this page for pricing information.)
To view full RFP question details Click Here!
Identify BOTH POS Software Features Availability and Deliverability
Unlike other RFPs that try (and fail) to gather useful solutions data about complex retail point of sale system features, RFP Masters are not constrained to the use of summary-level "Yes" or "No" answers. This RFP Master uses a Feature Support Matrix (FSM) that identify BOTH feature AVAILABILITY and DELIVERY Method. This RFP Master function is useful during both the retail point of sale software selection AND the system implementation phases of large projects because it enables effective Earned Value Management through detailed cross-referencing of usable software functionality and vendor invoicing.
Determine the Risk & Supportability of Proposed
Compares the Weighted Grade Point Score calculated for each proposed system. This is calculated as follows: The vendor response to each RFP question is assigned an unweighted "raw" score. This raw score is then multiplied by the weight factor you entered previously (default = 1) for that RFP question to calculate the weighted score for each response. All of these individual scores are then totaled for use in this comparison. This score is essentially a measure of how well a retail point of sale software system fits your business and software needs, prioritized by the weight (importance level) you assigned to each question in the RFP. In essence, this score measures the SUITABILITY of each proposed software system to your overall requirements. . NOTE this score measures just software functionality, and does not include any measure of vendor background, expertise, support, or programming ability.
Color-Coded, "Apples-to-Apples" Comparison of Proposed Systems
Vendor Response Input Validation.
Vendors must answer each RFP question by choosing from a pre-defined list of possible responses. See below for an example of this drop-down list. This forces all vendors to respond to each retail point of sale (POS) software question in a consistent, standard manner. Eliminates the days of time typically wasted trying to compare the inconsistent or incomplete vendor responses obtained by using traditional, non-quantitative RFP questions! Ensures vendor proposals are easy to compare and evaluate!
| Point of Sale RFP - General Retail | $229.00 ![]() |
COPYRIGHT © 1993 - 2011 Infotivity Technologies, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Supportability Index, Color Comparison, Suitability Analysis, Ready-to-Use RFP, RFP Master
Ready-to-Use RFP, and INFORequestor are trademark of Infotivity Technologies, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners