About Infotivity
        HOME - document management software selection

Document Management Software Selection

Accurately Evaluate Vendor Proposals! Select the System Best Suited to YOUR Needs! RFP Document Management Software Saves Time!
Planning Guides

Requirements Planning

Document Management Software Selection Guide
RFP Planning Checklist - FREE!
READY-to-USE RFP Templates
Document Management Software Evaluation
Custom RFP Development
RFP_Advisor
Newsletter List

Receive new RFP templates, FAQs, writing tips, and document management software selection advice. Just complete this form to subscribe!

INQUIRE HERE

GENERAL INQUIRIES
We are here to assist you!



    Effective RFP Techniques

   A document management software Request for Proposal (RFP) can be used to obtain many significant benefits in addition to simply comparing one vendor response to another. An RFP can be used to determine the:

  • RISK inherent in a proposed system
  • SUITABILITY of document management software to your needs
  • FINANCIAL Impact of a proposed system
  • TCO - the document management software's Total Cost of Ownership
yet many organizations are limited to using an RFP just for collecting and comparing vendor responses, and many find even that task to be very time-consuming and incomplete. The reason for this is most document management software RFPs do not use a question and vendor response (answer) format correctly suited to the product being acquired.

   To be most effective during the document management software selection process, an RFP must be much more than just a collection of Yes/No questions or free form essay responses. Why? Because Yes/No is too limited, especially for document management software applications, and the free-form essay response format allowing vendors to respond with anything imaginable does not provide the response consistency needed for truly "apples-to-apples" document management software comparisons.
   An RFP using the Yes/No response format requires a question for each specific document management software feature needed to accomplish a specific function, and this forces your RFP to be extremely long, with many questions. This makes comparing and evaluating responses to this type of RFP very difficult and error prone. It is also very difficult to easily and accurately analyze vendor responses to an RFP created with open-ended, essay-type questions, primarily because of the inconsistencies found in all the vendor responses.
   So just what are the right formats for a document management software RFP? Two of the most useful formats are the Feature Support Matrix and the Multiple Answer Matrix for collecting both Risk Assessment and Functional data regarding large, enterprise-wide document management software projects. The Feature Support Matrix is discussed below, with application-specific questions in the example pages.

THE CORRECT RFP FORMATS

   There are several document management software RFP question/response formats that can be used to maximize the usefulness and consistency of all vendor responses. This is important when one considers the fact that a specific document management software feature can be provided (delivered) using many methods. These can range from being part of the standard product "out-of-the-box", or provided as a "No Charge" document management software modification (enhancement), or provided on a Paid-for document management software modification.
   Technically, a document management software vendor can provide anything desired through custom programming, and this quickly becomes a problem because the issues of practicality and feasability are obscured by all the Yes answers. Just because a vendor states they are providing a feature as a no-charge modification does not mean they can deliver it on time or bug-free. The issue of RISK becomes very real.
   We recommend the following RFP techniques and question/response formats to obtain information in a consistent manner that cam also be used to assess both the SUITABILITY and the RISK inherent in a given document management software proposal.

RFP QUESTION FORMAT EXAMPLES

   Use the following formats to create a truly useful RFP that will efficiently collect information that accurately portrays BOTH a proposed document management software system's functionality AND it's RISK of implementation. Each example is first briefly explained, followed by an example highlighted in green.

# 1 - Feature Support Matrix

   This RFx question format is a very good way of identifying BOTH system feature AVAILABILITY, and the DELIVERY METHOD a vendor must utilize to provide that feature, in a completely quantitative format. This is ideal for collecting data used to determine the suitability (weighted grade point score) of a proposed document management software system to your needs, AND data needed to assess the RISK of it's implmentation.
   This type of RFx format is an excellent choice for RFIs & RFPs used to acquire enterprise-wide systems such as document management software. The risk assessment is very important here because of the complex nature of the target environment and the amount of custom scripting or programming that is involved.
   To use this format, you should first put the following instructions (highlighted in green) at the beginning of your RFP's System Requirements section (or similar).

(Additional information about using the Feature Support Matrix is available in the full Optimized RFP Guide. Please see the Optimized RFP Guide Details Form to order.)




      
rfpowriting.gif
Infotivity Technologies, Inc.
Dandridge, TN 37725
USA


E-mail us at info@infotivity.com

 

   All Request for Proposal (RFP) writing and
document management software advice, and RFP software companies
document managment software directory screens and HTML content is:
Copyright © 1993 - 2008 Infotivity Technologies, Inc.

Download
FREE

Document Management
RFP Here!

Document Management Software Vendor Directory

Partial User List
User
Testimonials:

"I have received many compliments from the CEO and other executives!"
- Mike Shickluna
Consultant

***
"The Request for Proposal tasks were made substantially easier"
- Darryl Marks
Benton County


Top of page for: RFP techniques